Reviewer Guidelines
January 13, 2025 2025-01-13 10:04Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer
The reviewer is a renowned person with extensive knowledge about the concerned subject. Reviewers play very important roles in the peer review process as they are the subject experts. Olites like most scientific publishing companies be contingent on effective peer review procedures to carry on not just the quality and legality of distinct articles but also the trustworthiness of the articles we publish in journals.
Selection of Reviewer:
By surveying the quality and legitimacy of another scientific author’s work, Olites supports our editors to select the potential reviewers based on the expertise on the article to complete the effective review process. Our editorial board members can select the reviewers for the assigned manuscripts. Reviewers are asked to provide detailed, constructive comments that will help the editors make a decision regarding publication and how the authors could improve their manuscript.
Peer Review Process:
The authenticity of scientific literature depends on effective peer review. It would be impossible to adjudge content credibility, without the judgment of knowledgeable peers as a standard for evaluating the quality of science. The peer review process is designed to assess the originality, validity, and overall quality of every manuscript submitted before it is finally accepted for publication. Reviewers help maintain the integrity of the publishing process by ensuring that plagiarized, poor quality, or other unsuitable work is not approved for publication.
Our motto of disseminating the scientific knowledge is completely relied upon effective peer review process. The knowledge and expertise of our reviewers are essential for maintaining high standards of the Olites publishers as the reviewing process is the first important step in the process of publication
Guidelines to be followed while Reviewing an Article
- All the reviewers should be attentive while they are reviewing the articles and also should be unbiased.
- The comments given by the reviewer must relevant and support to increase the quality of manuscript. Minor corrections like grammatical errors can be corrected by reviewer itself. Be specific and detail while providing comments
- Reviewers should review the manuscript within the provided timeline in order to facilitate timely completion of the review process and they should present the receiving letter once it is a
- A reviewer should uphold good relationship with editorial staff and editors.
- If the manuscript does not meet the criteria of the journal or is does not meet scientific rigor, the reviewer should directly convey the information to Editorial Office
The reviewers should focus on the following when evaluating a manuscript:
- Originality of the research
- Contribution to the respective fiel
- Quality
- Clarity of presentation
- Depth of research
- Accept
- Minor revision
- Major revision
- Reject
- Does not match with the scope of the journal. Submit to another journal
- Reviewers should not disclose the information in the manuscript unless it is published and must respect the confidentiality.
- The information in the manuscript should not be used by the reviewers for their own benefits and must not share with another organization or individual.
- The reviewers must ensure that the journals receive their true and actual personal and professional information that is a testimony to their expertise
- Peer Review Process should not be influenced by the nationality, origin, religion, gender etc. of the authors i.e. there should be no discrimination while performing the peer review process
- Reviewers should inform the Editor immediately if they find that the manuscript is not unique and plagiarism free.
- It should be immediately informed to the Editor if the reviewer finds that the manuscript already been reviewed by them for any other journal.
- Reviewers are not allowed to contact the authors without the permission of the Editor.
- The reviewer is also responsible for informing the editor regarding the suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, or any ethical concerns about the use of animals or humans in the research submitted by the author.
- The reviewer should not review the manuscript that is co-authored by him/her and anyone related to their institution.
Call for Reviewers
Information Menu
Downloads
Collaborations
Articles